Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation for the Treatment of Grade II-III Hemorrhoids: Is it Worth the Use of Doppler Guide in Long-Term Follow-Up?: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Background: Hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) may reduce postoperative pain and complications and shorten patients' recovery when compared to standard hemorrhoidectomy. It is unclear if the Doppler guide (DG) is useful in reducing recurrence risk. Objective: To compare two groups of patients (treated with DG-HAL or HAL) in terms of recurrence risk and patients' satisfaction grade. Methods: Between January 1, 2014 and January 31, 2021, 122 patients affected by grade II-III hemorrhoidal prolapse underwent DG-HAL or HAL at Chivasso Hospital, Italy. Mucopexy was routinely performed. After discharge, patients were subjected to 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month clinical assessment. Thereafter, they were interviewed by telephone annually. Results: Seventy-six (62.3%) DG-HAL and 46 (37.7%) HAL procedures were performed. Median surgical time was 30 (15-45) minutes for DG-HAL versus 25 (15-40) minutes for HAL (P = 0.005). No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative bleeding needing surgery occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients in the DG-HAL group. During a median follow-up of 46 months (6-86), we registered 18 (23.7%) recurrences in the DG-HAL group and 13 (28.3%) in the HAL one (P = 0.574). No cases of incontinence or anal stenosis occurred. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of patients' satisfaction. At multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years resulted a protective factor for recurrence (odds ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047). Conclusions: In our study, the use of DG did not reduce recurrence risk. Operative time was significantly increased in the DG-HAL group.

Preaponeurotic endoscopic repair (REPA) of diastasis recti: a single surgeon's experience.

BACKGROUND: Diastasis recti is a pathology that affects not only the abdominal wall but also the stability of lumbopelvic muscles, consequently altering urinary and digestive functionality. Preaponeurotic endoscopic repair (REPA) is an endoscopic alternative to tummy tuck for the treatment of diastasis. In this study, the outcomes of REPA application by a single surgeon are presented. METHODS: A total of 172 patients underwent REPA for the treatment of diastasis recti between August 2017 and December 2019. One hundred twenty-four patients were followed for at least one year. Sixty-three patients responded to a survey on satisfaction and quality of life 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Three (2.4%) recurrences occurred, of which two occurred in the same patient. The main postoperative complications observed were 12 (9.7%) seromas, 3 (2.4%) haematomas, a single wound infection, 3 (2.4%) cases of skin fold formation, and a case of trophic skin lesion that required negative pressure therapy. Quality of life after surgery, as reported by 63 patients who responded to the survey, was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: REPA is a safe and effective technique for diastasis recti treatment, representing a valid alternative to abdominoplasty. Since there is no need to access the peritoneal cavity and the mesh is onlay, there are no risks of bowel damage or adhesions between the intestine and prosthesis.

Effectiveness of Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Subcutaneous Onlay Laparoscopic Approach (SCOLA) Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative analgesia in SCOLA (subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach) surgery is traditionally based on intravenous opioids. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the efficacy of bilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane (SCTAP) block on postoperative pain relief in the first 48 postoperative hours following SCOLA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2017 to December 2019, 163 patients were eligible for the analysis. Postoperative analgesia was managed either with an intravenous tramadol continuous infusion (opioid group) or a multimodal opioid-sparing strategy based on bilateral SCTAP block (SCTAP group), according to the anesthesiologist's postoperative plan. After data collection, 103 patients were assigned post hoc to the SCTAP group and 60 patients to the opioid group. The primary outcome was the evaluation of postoperative pain, considering both the Numeric Rating Scale score and the percentage of patients with uncontrolled pain at 6, 12, 24, or 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were differences in the administration of ketorolac rescue analgesia and incidence of mild adverse effects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in median Numeric Rating Scale at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours and ketorolac rescue dose consumption in both groups. Five patients (4.85% of a total of 103 patients) referred postoperative nausea and vomiting in the SCTAP group versus 10 patients (16.67% of a total of 60 patients) in the opioid group (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Analgesia with SCTAP block seems to represent a feasible and efficient strategy for pain management in patients undergoing SCOLA surgery, allowing good quality analgesia, low opioids requirements, and reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Endoscopic preaponeurotic access for complex ventral hernia repair with sublay mesh and bilateral anterior component separation: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive techniques are now routine in complex abdominal wall defects repair. Although laparoscopy allows to reduce post-operative pain, promoting a more rapid recovery and shortening hospital stay, it is associated with risk of bowel injury and adhesions development, when intraperitoneal mesh is placed. We report the case of a patient affected by large recurrent incisional hernia, treated with a new hybrid endoscopic approach. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Patient treated with the novel approach is a 53-year-old male, BMI 27, smoker, with epigastric recurrence of incisional hernia and prosthetic fistula. An endoscopic preaponeurotic subcutaneous access was used. Repair with sublay mesh, bilateral anterior component separation and muscular reinsertions was conducted. Three months after surgery, no signs of recurrence were observed and complete functional recovery had been achieved. DISCUSSION: The new technique adopted benefits from all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, allowing to avoid risks associated with laparoscopic access. Bilateral anterior component separation with muscular reinsertions is the key for tension-free suture. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first time that a complex recurrent incisional hernia is repaired with the hybrid technique aforementioned. The approach used is certainly technically challenging, thus requiring a team skilled in the use of laparoscopy. Good outcomes reported are a further demonstration that minimally invasive surgery can be a valid alternative to traditional open techniques for large abdominal wall defects repair.